Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Project Home | | Name/Date/Doc | | Folder/Volume | | Series Notes | | Single Doc | | Rutgers Home
Previous Text  Where am I?  Next Text
Legal Series -- Legal Department Records -- Phonograph:
[QP4]

[The following note describes a series of folders and volumes and has no documents attached to it. For that reason, a "no Documents found" message will appear if the "List Documents" button at the bottom of the note is used. To see the document lists for the folders and volumes described here, use the "Which Series Notes?" button to enter the Series Notes or use the "Next Text" button to move to the first item in the series.]

This material consists of correspondence, court documents, and other items relating to patent interference proceedings and infringement suits, contract disputes, and other legal actions involving Edison's phonograph. Included are items pertaining to the protracted litigation over phonograph sales rights. Also included are documents dealing with musical copyright, corporate organization, embezzlement, and the unlicenced use of Edison's name. Most of the selected items cover the years 1899-1910, but a few case files begin during the mid-1890s and some continue into the 1910s. Approximately half of the cases relate to litigation involving the National Phonograph Co. or other Edison interests and the American Graphophone Co. or its associated sales company, the Columbia Phonograph Co., General. Other cases deal with the disposition of litigation between Edison and the New York Phonograph Co.; the supply of Edison phonographs to Europe; patent infringement by Pathé Frères in France; and Mexican copyright law. In addition, there is a case file containing information concerning price maintenance litigation pursued by the National Phonograph Co. and its affiliates.

Less than 10 percent of the documents have been selected. The selected items reflect Edison's personal involvement in legal matters, detail experimental work done by Edison or his assistants, or broadly pertain to matters of corporate organization and stratagems employed against competitors. The documents have been arranged in the following order:

Correspondence
General
Douglas Phonograph Company
Foreign Copyright
Higham, Daniel
Infringement Searches [not selected]
Petit, Ademor N. [not selected]
Trademarks and Trade Names [not selected]
200-Thread Record
Interference Proceedings
Macdonald v. Edison (No. 20,775)
Edison v. Petit v. Capps (No. 22,202); Edison v. Jones (No. 22,203)
Edison v. Smith (No. 25,460)
Edison v. Macdonald (No. 25,677)
Case Files
American Graphophone Company v. National Phonograph Company [2 cases]
American Graphophone Company v. National Phonograph Company and Blackman Talking Machine Company
American Graphophone Company v. Cleveland Walcutt et al.
Columbia Phonograph Company v. National Phonograph Company and William J. Rahley; Columbia Phonograph Company v. John E. Whitson and Walter J. Whitson and the National Phonograph Company
Thomas A. Edison v. Frederic M. Prescott
Thomas A. Edison et al. v. New York Phonograph Company et al.; New York Phonograph Company v. Siegel-Cooper Company
Thomas A. Edison, Inc. v. United States Phonograph Company
Edison Phonograph Works v. Edison United Phonograph Company; Edison United Phonograph Company v. Edison Phonograph WorksEdison United Phonograph Company v. Thomas A. Edison et al.
José Elizondo et al. v. Jorge Alcalde
International Graphophone Company v. Thomas A. Edison et al.
George Croyden Marks v. Pathé Frères
National Phonograph Company v. American Graphophone Company [2 cases]; New Jersey Patent Company v. American Graphophone Company
National Phonograph Company v. American Graphophone Company and Columbia Phonograph Company, General [3 cases]
National Phonograph Company v. Lambert Company
National Phonograph Company v. Lambert Company and Thomas B. Lambert; Edison Phonograph Company v. Lambert Company and Thomas B. Lambert
New Jersey Patent Company v. Columbia Phonograph Company, General
New York Phonograph Company v. National Phonograph Company et al.United States of America v. James L. Andem
United States of America on the Relation of National Phonograph Company v. Frederick I. Allen, Commissioner of Patents
Price Maintenance Cases


Courtesy of Thomas Edison National Historical Park.